[DevJobsIndo] External Evaluator for Mid-Term Evaluation
Our project is currently looking for External Evaluator, either individual or organization may send proposal by 24 October 2015 to : [email protected]
Mid-Term
Evaluation ToR
Evaluation ToR
The
Project of Community Treatment and Social Integration for People Who Use Drugs
and People Living with HIV/AIDS which is funded by German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through
Caritas Germany has been implemented by Caritas PSE since January 2014. The 1st
phase of the project will run for three years beginning from January 2014 to
December 2016.
Project of Community Treatment and Social Integration for People Who Use Drugs
and People Living with HIV/AIDS which is funded by German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ) through
Caritas Germany has been implemented by Caritas PSE since January 2014. The 1st
phase of the project will run for three years beginning from January 2014 to
December 2016.
The overall objective of
this project is to fulfil the rights
of People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) and living in vulnerable condition and prone to
HIV/AIDS, extreme poverty, social exclusion, etc) within an inclusive
community. The specific objectives of this project as follows:
this project is to fulfil the rights
of People Who Use Drugs (PWUD) and living in vulnerable condition and prone to
HIV/AIDS, extreme poverty, social exclusion, etc) within an inclusive
community. The specific objectives of this project as follows:
1. To strengthen existing networking to improve access drugs addiction,
prevention, treatment, social re-integration including health also psychosocial
components.
prevention, treatment, social re-integration including health also psychosocial
components.
2. To increase the quality of prevention, harm reduction, treatment, social
re-integration program of Caritas PSE
re-integration program of Caritas PSE
3. To develop livelihood program as strategy for economic sustainability for
PWUD and PLWHA
PWUD and PLWHA
This
project directly benefits drugs user and those underprivileged who are severely excluded and vulnerable to other diseases
those who are included in this category are children and youth living in the
streets and the highly vulnerable-groups to HIV, STD/STI, TB, and Hepatitis
transmission. The project also benefits young drugs addict, school
students and family of drugs users both in Medan municipality and regencies in
North Sumatera.
project directly benefits drugs user and those underprivileged who are severely excluded and vulnerable to other diseases
those who are included in this category are children and youth living in the
streets and the highly vulnerable-groups to HIV, STD/STI, TB, and Hepatitis
transmission. The project also benefits young drugs addict, school
students and family of drugs users both in Medan municipality and regencies in
North Sumatera.
The
main activities of the project include awareness-raising counselling in school,
prison and several hotspots where drugs addicts usually get together, outreach,
advocacy to government to ensure PWUDs and PLWHA receive BPJS, provision of
financial support for PWUD which is extremely poor, homeless, abandoned by family,
facilitating PWUDs to legal aid institute to receive legal aid, providing
life-skill also facilitating drugs users who have completed recovery program to
integrate in the communities after they completed their recovery program. As
per the project proposal, a mid-term evaluation for this project has been
planned and has been budgeted. Therefore this mid-term is conducted.
main activities of the project include awareness-raising counselling in school,
prison and several hotspots where drugs addicts usually get together, outreach,
advocacy to government to ensure PWUDs and PLWHA receive BPJS, provision of
financial support for PWUD which is extremely poor, homeless, abandoned by family,
facilitating PWUDs to legal aid institute to receive legal aid, providing
life-skill also facilitating drugs users who have completed recovery program to
integrate in the communities after they completed their recovery program. As
per the project proposal, a mid-term evaluation for this project has been
planned and has been budgeted. Therefore this mid-term is conducted.
2. Objectives
of the Mid-Term Evaluation
of the Mid-Term Evaluation
The objectives of
this Mid-Term Evaluation as follows:
this Mid-Term Evaluation as follows:
1.
To
look at the progress of the project against stated outputs as of January 2014.
To
look at the progress of the project against stated outputs as of January 2014.
2.
To
identify issues and challenges affecting effectiveness and efficiency in
achieving expected results.
To
identify issues and challenges affecting effectiveness and efficiency in
achieving expected results.
3.
To get
evidence-based finding in order to formulate corrective measures and
recommendations.
To get
evidence-based finding in order to formulate corrective measures and
recommendations.
4.
To
make decision whether results obtained so far require modifications in aims and
indicators.
To
make decision whether results obtained so far require modifications in aims and
indicators.
This mid-term
evaluation is hoped to pave the way for improved project implementation for the
remaining project duration and propose modifications (if any) required in
project design, implementation arrangements and/or institutional linkages in
order to effectively and sustainably contribute to the living condition of
beneficiaries.
evaluation is hoped to pave the way for improved project implementation for the
remaining project duration and propose modifications (if any) required in
project design, implementation arrangements and/or institutional linkages in
order to effectively and sustainably contribute to the living condition of
beneficiaries.
3. Key
Focus Areas
Focus Areas
The Mid-Term Evaluation will assess the project
implementation according to the evaluation standard below:
implementation according to the evaluation standard below:
Relevance
1. Assess
the contribution of the project towards regional and national objectives of
drugs and HIV/AIDSintervention program in national and regional level.
the contribution of the project towards regional and national objectives of
drugs and HIV/AIDSintervention program in national and regional level.
2. Analyze
whether the project’s strategy for drugs recovery program addresses the needs
and demands of the beneficiaries in a disaggregated manner (for men and women),
and the community response especially in North Sumatera context especially
(in-patient program) or whether there is a need to initiate out-patient or Half
Way House.
whether the project’s strategy for drugs recovery program addresses the needs
and demands of the beneficiaries in a disaggregated manner (for men and women),
and the community response especially in North Sumatera context especially
(in-patient program) or whether there is a need to initiate out-patient or Half
Way House.
3. Assess
the relevance of the tools/instruments/SOP applied by the project for improving
service for the beneficiaries.
the relevance of the tools/instruments/SOP applied by the project for improving
service for the beneficiaries.
4. Assess
the relevance and effect of re-formulating/re-branding for improving recovery
program.
the relevance and effect of re-formulating/re-branding for improving recovery
program.
5. Assess
whether the drugs recovery program has been synergized with the existing
divisions/units (Micro Finance Institution, Clinic, Hospital, business units
etc.) under the Archdiocese of Medan
whether the drugs recovery program has been synergized with the existing
divisions/units (Micro Finance Institution, Clinic, Hospital, business units
etc.) under the Archdiocese of Medan
Effectiveness
1. Review how
far is the achievement of expected results as mentioned in the logical
framework and proposal.
far is the achievement of expected results as mentioned in the logical
framework and proposal.
2.Assess the
performance, capacity and work division of the project staff so far with
particular reference to qualitative and quantitative achievements of
outputs and targets as defined in the project documents and work-plans.
performance, capacity and work division of the project staff so far with
particular reference to qualitative and quantitative achievements of
outputs and targets as defined in the project documents and work-plans.
3.Delegation of
task/work and communication between the project staff and the management
of Caritas PSE.
task/work and communication between the project staff and the management
of Caritas PSE.
4.Technical and
administrative support from the management of Caritas PSE to the project.
administrative support from the management of Caritas PSE to the project.
5.Role
of Caritas PSE’s management in monitoring project performance and results?
of Caritas PSE’s management in monitoring project performance and results?
Efficiency
1. Assess whether inputs (human resources, funds and
materials) have been strategically and efficiently utilized to achieve
objectives of the project.
materials) have been strategically and efficiently utilized to achieve
objectives of the project.
2.
Assess whether the results that have been achieved so
far and justified the costs.
Assess whether the results that have been achieved so
far and justified the costs.
3.
Assess whether the project funds and activities been
implemented in a timely manner.
Assess whether the project funds and activities been
implemented in a timely manner.
4.
Assess whether the project has utilized project
funding as per the approved budget and log frame to achieve the planned
objectives.
Assess whether the project has utilized project
funding as per the approved budget and log frame to achieve the planned
objectives.
5. Identify factors and constraints which have affected
project implementation including technical, managerial, organizational,
institutional and political and social, economic and security and other
external factors unforeseen during the project planning.
project implementation including technical, managerial, organizational,
institutional and political and social, economic and security and other
external factors unforeseen during the project planning.
Sustainability and Impact
1.
Assess
preliminary indications of the degree to which the project results are likely
to be sustainable beyond the project’s lifetime (both at the community and
government level), and provide recommendations for strengthening
sustainability.
Assess
preliminary indications of the degree to which the project results are likely
to be sustainable beyond the project’s lifetime (both at the community and
government level), and provide recommendations for strengthening
sustainability.
2.
Assess
the sustainability of the project interventions in terms of their effect on
environment.
Assess
the sustainability of the project interventions in terms of their effect on
environment.
3.
Analyze
the emerging impact on the beneficiaries for both male and female in terms of
resilience to relapse and staying sober.
Analyze
the emerging impact on the beneficiaries for both male and female in terms of
resilience to relapse and staying sober.
Lessons learnt/ Conclusions
1.
Analyze
component for modifying program planning, especially relating to capacity of
institutions for project decision making and delivery.
Analyze
component for modifying program planning, especially relating to capacity of
institutions for project decision making and delivery.
2.
Identify
significant lessons or conclusions which can be drawn from the project in terms
of effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact.
Identify
significant lessons or conclusions which can be drawn from the project in terms
of effectiveness, efficiency, sustainability and impact.
4. Outputs
The findings and recommendations will be thoroughly
discussed with project partners and Caritas Germany Indonesia.The evaluator will complete and submit a draft final
report (in English and Indonesia) in
both hard and soft copy at the end of the work. The key outputs of the Mid-Term
Evaluatio n (MTE) are:
discussed with project partners and Caritas Germany Indonesia.The evaluator will complete and submit a draft final
report (in English and Indonesia) in
both hard and soft copy at the end of the work. The key outputs of the Mid-Term
Evaluatio n (MTE) are:
1.
Submission
of a draft report format containing Table of Contents for the final report for
approval by both Caritas PSE & Caritas Germany Indonesia.
Submission
of a draft report format containing Table of Contents for the final report for
approval by both Caritas PSE & Caritas Germany Indonesia.
2.
The
evaluators will present their key findings key findings and recommendations to
management Caritas PSE and Caritas Germany Indonesia.
The
evaluators will present their key findings key findings and recommendations to
management Caritas PSE and Caritas Germany Indonesia.
3.
The
final report should be logically structured, contain evidence-based findings,
conclusions, lessons and recommendations, and should be free of information
that is not relevant to the overall analysis. The report should respond in
detail to the key focus areas described above. It should include a set of
specific recommendations formulated for the project, and identify the necessary
corrective actions required to be undertaken, who should undertake those and
possible time-lines (if any). Caritas
PSE Medan and Caritas Germany Indonesia will provide comments on the Draft
Report, and the evaluator will finalize the report in view of these comments.
The
final report should be logically structured, contain evidence-based findings,
conclusions, lessons and recommendations, and should be free of information
that is not relevant to the overall analysis. The report should respond in
detail to the key focus areas described above. It should include a set of
specific recommendations formulated for the project, and identify the necessary
corrective actions required to be undertaken, who should undertake those and
possible time-lines (if any). Caritas
PSE Medan and Caritas Germany Indonesia will provide comments on the Draft
Report, and the evaluator will finalize the report in view of these comments.
5. Documents to be reviewed by evaluators:
o
Project
Proposal
Project
Proposal
o
Project
Log frame
Project
Log frame
o
Annual
Report January to December 2014
Annual
Report January to December 2014
o
Semester
progress reports 2015
progress reports 2015
o
SOPs
SOPs
o
Work
plan
Work
plan
o
Other
Other
related documents
6. The desired evaluators must :
1.
have at least 5
year of experiences in the field of drugs rehabilitation and intervention
program and its methodology also management of Drugs Intervention Program
have at least 5
year of experiences in the field of drugs rehabilitation and intervention
program and its methodology also management of Drugs Intervention Program
2.
hold minimum
bachelor degree (S1) and ideally a master degree, preferably in Psychology and
having a combination of theoretical and practical experiences in drugs
rehabilitation treatment is most preferred.
hold minimum
bachelor degree (S1) and ideally a master degree, preferably in Psychology and
having a combination of theoretical and practical experiences in drugs
rehabilitation treatment is most preferred.
3.
have strong
analytical abilities and capable of drawing recommendations from data
collected.
have strong
analytical abilities and capable of drawing recommendations from data
collected.
4.
be skillful in
quantitative and qualitative evaluation
be skillful in
quantitative and qualitative evaluation
Organization or individual who is interested, kindly send proposal
containing:
containing:
§ CV
§ Work plan
§ Methodology
§ Experiences
§ Budget
§ Composition of Team
§ Relevant Portfolio
7.
Methodology
Methodology
This MTE will use a consultative and participative approach by
conducting field visits to project sites and meetings with agencies
(governments and NGOs, communities/project direct beneficiaries in Medan and
outsides Medan to collect primary or first-hand information. The evaluators
also need to meet the project team, management of Caritas PSE, relevant
government agencies / partners at provincial and district level, if need be,
the evaluator may also meet other agencies /projects engaged in similar
interventions.
conducting field visits to project sites and meetings with agencies
(governments and NGOs, communities/project direct beneficiaries in Medan and
outsides Medan to collect primary or first-hand information. The evaluators
also need to meet the project team, management of Caritas PSE, relevant
government agencies / partners at provincial and district level, if need be,
the evaluator may also meet other agencies /projects engaged in similar
interventions.
8.
Reporting Structure
Reporting Structure
The final report should contain and be developed according to the
structure below:
structure below:
o Executive Summary
o Background
o Objective
o Methodology
o Findings and Analysis
o Conclusions, lesson-learnt and Recommendations
o Annexes
9.
Budget
Budget
The
budget that is allocated for the evaluators to cover consultation fee,
per-diem, meal, as well as travel cost for evaluator. Local transport of
consultant i.e. field visit, interview key stakeholder, to conduct FDG,
presentation meeting will be handled by Caritas PSE Medan
budget that is allocated for the evaluators to cover consultation fee,
per-diem, meal, as well as travel cost for evaluator. Local transport of
consultant i.e. field visit, interview key stakeholder, to conduct FDG,
presentation meeting will be handled by Caritas PSE Medan
10.
Logistical Support
Logistical Support
Caritas PSE Medan will handle logistical need such as
transportation from office to the field, accommodation, flight tickets,
appointment and arrangement for meetings with stakeholders and beneficiaries.
transportation from office to the field, accommodation, flight tickets,
appointment and arrangement for meetings with stakeholders and beneficiaries.
Visit Today : 71
This Month : 1545
Hits Today : 382
Total Hits : 477266
Who's Online : 5
